Legal Research AI

in the Interest of T.P., K.P. and T.P.

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date filed: 2014-09-04
Citations:
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases

                                       In The

                                Court of Appeals
                    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
                            ____________________
                               NO. 09-14-00200-CV
                            ____________________

                  IN THE INTEREST OF T.P., K.P. AND T.P.
_______________________________________________________             ______________

                On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3
                        Montgomery County, Texas
                      Trial Cause No. 13-05-05380 CV
________________________________________________________             _____________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      On June 3, 2014, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed

for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the

appellant explained why additional time was needed to file the record. Appellant

did not respond to this Court’s notices.

      Appellant did not file an affidavit of indigence on appeal and has not shown

that he is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1.

There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the clerk’s record, we

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b); Tex. R.

App. P. 42.3.

                                           1
      APPEAL DISMISSED.

                                           ________________________________
                                                   STEVE McKEITHEN
                                                        Chief Justice

Submitted on September 3, 2014
Opinion Delivered September 4, 2014

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.




                                       2