INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS v. Dorsey

Court: Michigan Supreme Court
Date filed: 2006-03-29
Citations: 711 N.W.2d 79, 474 Mich. 1097, 711 N.W.2d 79, 474 Mich. 1097, 711 N.W.2d 79, 474 Mich. 1097
Copy Citations
1 Citing Case

Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
                                                                                                   Lansing, Michigan

  March 29, 2006                                                                                         Clifford W. Taylor,
                                                                                                                 Chief Justice

  129880 & (67)                                                                                        Michael F. Cavanagh
                                                                                                       Elizabeth A. Weaver
  INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED                                                                                 Marilyn Kelly
  AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE &                                                                                Maura D. Corrigan
  AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS                                                                       Robert P. Young, Jr.
  OF AMERICA and UNITED BROADCASTING                                                                   Stephen J. Markman,
                                                                                                                      Justices
  NETWORK, INC.,
           Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants-
           Appellants,
  v                                                                 SC: 129880
                                                                    COA: 248412
                                                                    Washtenaw CC: 97-008442-CB
  HELEN DORSEY, PAT CHOATE, and
  EDWARD A. MILLER,
           Defendants/Counterplaintiffs/Third-
           Party Plaintiffs-Appellees,
  and
  KAY CASEY,
           Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee,
  and
  DANIEL SHERRICK, ROY WYSE, and JOYCE
  FRANK,
           Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.

  _________________________________________/

          On order of the Court, the motion for admittance pro hac vice is GRANTED. The
  application for leave to appeal the October 4, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is
  considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, for the
  reasons stated in the partial dissent in the Court of Appeals, we REVERSE that part of
  the Court of Appeals opinion that granted a new trial, and REMAND this case to the
  Court of Appeals for consideration of the issues defendants raised in their motion for new
  trial that the Court of Appeals did not reach. Should the Court of Appeals affirm the
  circuit court’s denial of defendants’ motion for new trial, it shall reinstate mediation
  sanctions.

        We do not retain jurisdiction.




                           I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
                     foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
                           March 29, 2006                      _________________________________________
         s0322                                                                 Clerk


Boost your productivity today

Delegate legal research to Cetient AI. Ask AI to search, read, and cite cases and statutes.