James Friend v. State

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date filed: 2015-11-04
Citations:
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Combined Opinion
                    In The
              Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana


                  No. 06-15-00099-CR



              JAMES FRIEND, Appellant

                           V.

           THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee



        On Appeal from the 102nd District Court
                Bowie County, Texas
            Trial Court No. 14F0439-102




      Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
                                           ORDER

        James Friend appeals from his conviction of murder. Friend’s appellate counsel has filed

a motion to supplement the record on appeal and to stay the briefing deadlines. This motion is

based on the fact that three motions and one brief presented to the trial court on Friend’s behalf do

not appear in the clerk’s record: (1) defendant’s motion to limit jury argument, (2) defendant’s

motion in limine, (3) defendant’s motion to invoke husband-wife confidential communication

privilege, and (4) brief in support of admission of certain bad acts of the decedent. According to

Friend, the Bowie County District Clerk’s Office indicated that the subject documents were not

included in the clerk’s record because they were not filed in that office. Friend complains that,

without copies of the written motions and brief in the clerk’s record, he is unable to determine

whether the denial of those motions present points of error for appeal. Ultimately, Friend seeks

an abatement to the trial court for correction of what he deems an inaccurate clerk’s record.

        It is a party’s responsibility to file all motions or other documents he wishes to appear in

the district clerk’s file. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 21. Documents not filed with the district clerk will

typically not appear in the clerk’s record. The fact that the missing motions and brief do not appear

in the district clerk’s record indicates that Friend failed to file them with the district clerk. Here,

however, the reporter’s record indicates that at least one of the above-listed documents may have

been filed by the trial court.

        We, therefore, abate this appeal to the trial court pursuant to Rule 34.5(d) of the Texas

Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(d). The trial court is to conduct a hearing

and determine whether one or more of the aforementioned documents was filed with the trial court.


                                                  2
Each such document that is found to have been filed by the trial court is to be included in a

supplemental clerk’s record in accordance with Rule 34.5(c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c).

       The hearing shall be conducted by the trial court within twenty days of the date of this

order, or on or before November 24, 2015. The trial court’s findings concerning the above matter

shall be submitted to this Court in the form of a supplemental clerk’s record, together with each

such document listed above that was filed by the trial court. The supplemental clerk’s and

reporter’s records of that hearing shall be prepared immediately and shall be received by this Court

no later than December 4, 2015. No extensions will be granted.

       All appellate timetables are stayed and will resume on our receipt of either the

supplemental clerk’s or reporter’s record.

       IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                              BY THE COURT

Date: November 4, 2015




                                                 3