Jones v. Nicholson

Court: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Date filed: 2007-06-08
Citations: 236 F. App'x 607
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Combined Opinion
                           NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
                                           2006-7307

                                       BOBBY R. JONES,

                                                     Claimant-Appellant,

                                                v.

                                    R. JAMES NICHOLSON,
                                  Secretary of Veterans Affairs,

                                                     Respondent-Appellee.

                                          ON MOTION

Before SCHALL, GAJARSA, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

LINN, Circuit Judge.

                                           ORDER

       Bobby R. Jones moves without opposition to vacate the final judgment of the

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in Jones v. Nicholson, No. 03-1996

(Vet.App. June 9, 2006), and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision in

Barrett v. Nicholson, 466 F.3d 1038 (Fed. Cir. 2006).

       Jones filed an untimely appeal with the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.

The court dismissed his appeal for lack of jurisdiction, stating that he failed to establish

entitlement to equitable tolling of the 120-day period.            The court rejected Jones’

argument that the Secretary had a duty to assist him in developing evidence relevant to

the issue of equitable tolling.

       In Barrett, this court held that when a veteran alleges facts to show entitlement to

equitable tolling, and jurisdiction is called into question, the government must assist the
court by providing and, where necessary, procuring further evidence helpful in deciding

jurisdiction. Barrett, 466 F.3d at 1044.

       Because the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims rejected the assistance

endorsed by this court in Barrett, we vacate the court’s judgment and remand the case

for reconsideration in light of Barrett.

       Accordingly,

       IT IS ORDERED THAT:

       (1)    The motion is granted.

       (2)    All sides shall bear their own costs.

                                                    FOR THE COURT




       June 5, 2007                                 /s/ Richard Linn
          Date                                      Richard Linn
                                                    Circuit Judge


cc:    Mark R. Lippman, Esq.
       Phyllis Jo Baunach, Esq.

s19

ISSUED AS A MANDATE:                 June 5, 2007




2006-7307
                                            -2-