Juan J. Molina and San Juana Molina v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. Soley as Nominee for Novastar Mortgage Inc., Its Successors and Assigns

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date filed: 2014-02-13
Citations:
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Combined Opinion
                           NUMBER 13-13-00671-CV

                           COURT OF APPEALS

                 THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

JUAN J. MOLINA AND
SAN JUANA MOLINA,                                                      Appellants,

                                         V.

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.
SOLEY AS NOMINEE FOR
NOVASTAR MORTGAGE INC.,
ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS,                         Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

             On Appeal from the 197th District Court
                   of Willacy County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
     Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Longoria
                    Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

      Appellants, Juan J. Molina and San Juana Molina, perfected an appeal from a

judgment rendered by the 197th District Court of Willacy County. On January 15, 2014,
the Clerk of this Court notified appellants that the clerk's record in the above cause was

originally due on December 9, 2014, and that the deputy district clerk, Gilbert Lozano,

had notified this Court that appellants failed to make arrangements for payment of the

clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellants of this defect so that steps

could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3,

42.3(b),(c). Appellants were advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days

from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of

prosecution.

      Appellants have failed to respond to this Court’s notice. Accordingly, the appeal

is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).



                                                PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
13th day of February, 2014.




                                            2