FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 02 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARK DEWAYNE PORTER, No. 09-35524 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 1:07-cv-00605-CL v. MEMORANDUM * JEAN HILL; et al., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Owen M. Panner, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 19, 2010 ** Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges. Mark Dewayne Porter, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that his legal mail was opened outside his presence in violation of his constitutional rights. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, appellant’s request for oral argument is denied. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Bahrampour v. Lampert, 356 F.3d 969, 973 (9th Cir. 2004). We may affirm on any ground supported by the record, San Jose Christian Coll. v. City of Morgan Hill, 360 F.3d 1024, 1030 (9th Cir. 2004), and we affirm. Defendants were entitled to summary judgment based on qualified immunity because the law concerning the opening of prisoners’ legal mail outside their presence was not clearly established at the time the alleged violations occurred. See Pearson v. Callahan, 129 S. Ct. 808, 822 (2009) (concluding that state officers were entitled to qualified immunity because their actions did not violate clearly established law); Sherman v. MacDougall, 656 F.2d 527, 528 (9th Cir. 1981) (reserving issue of whether there is a constitutional violation where a prison official opens a prisoner’s legal mail outside the prisoner’s presence). Porter’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive. Porter’s “Motion for Stay of Obayence” [sic] is denied. AFFIRMED. 2 09-35524
Mark Porter v. Jean Hill
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date filed: 2010-11-02
Citations: 402 F. App'x 285
Copy CitationsCombined Opinion