Per Curiam.
Considering the fact that this is a summary proceeding, where prompt action is necessary, we find no question of law is presented which requires reversal. (Election Law [Cons. Laws, ch. 17], §§ 330, 335.)
The Supreme Court made “ such order as justice may require,” within the contemplation of the Election Law. (§ 330.) To order a new trial at this time for technical errors not affecting substantial rights would be a futility.
The order should be affirmed.
Pound, Ch. J., Crane, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch and Loughran, JJ., concur; Lehman, J., not sitting..
Order affirmed.