UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1800
In Re: ANDREW CLIFFORD MOORE,
Debtor.
_________________________
GEORGE E. MCDERMOTT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ANDREW CLIFFORD MOORE,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
UNITED STATES TRUSTEE,
Party in Interest.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
97-1822-PJM, BK-88-42746, AP-95-1249)
Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: December 29, 1998
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George E. McDermott, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
George E. McDermott appeals from the district court’s order
dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order denying his
motion to reopen his adversary proceeding against Andrew Moore
alleging that confirmation of Moore’s Chapter 11 plan was obtained
by fraud. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See McDermott v. Moore, No.
CA-97-1822-PJM; BK-88-42746; AP-95-1249 (D. Md. May 18, 1998). We
deny McDermott’s motion for injunctive relief in which he sought to
enjoin the enforcement of this court’s prior opinion, and we deny
his motion for suggestion of removal from this court. See In re
Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 827 (4th Cir. 1987). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
McDermott v. Moore
Combined Opinion