Moore v. Catawba Power Co.

Court: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Date filed: 1904-03-11
Citations: 46 S.E. 1004, 68 S.C. 201, 46 S.E. 1004, 68 S.C. 201, 46 S.E. 1004, 68 S.C. 201
Copy Citations
4 Citing Cases

March 11, 1904. The opinion of the Court was delivered by We do not think this case can be distinguished in principle from Lynch v. Spartan Mills, 66 S.C. 12. The views there expressed are in accord with the decisions of other Courts. Monahan v. NorthwesternContracting Co., 84 Wis. 586, 54 N.W., 1025; Carey v.Ry. Co., 67 Wis. 608, 31 N.W., 163; Ry. Co. v. Templeton,87 Tex., 42; 26 S.W. 1066; Cox v. Providence Gas Co.,17 R.I. 199, 21 Atl., 344; Preston v. R.R. Co., 64 Vt., 280,25 Atl., 486. The motion to make the complaint more definite and certain should have been refused.

The judgment of this Court is, that the judgment of the Circuit Court be reversed.

Boost your productivity today

Delegate legal research to Cetient AI. Ask AI to search, read, and cite cases and statutes.