Legal Research AI

Moseby v. Bedford County Bank

Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date filed: 1886-10-04
Citations: 3 Sadler 62
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases

Per Curiam:

We see no error in the answers to the points submitted by the defendant below. There was evidence showing that the notes in contention were accepted as a renewal of the former notes. It was not essentially necessary for the books to show an entry of the discount of the later notes. The case was submitted to the jury under proper instructions.

Judgment affirmed.