Per Curiam,
In these two cases, the court below refused to enter judgments for want of sufficient affidavits of defense,
Page 124
and there followed the instant appeals, which were presented to us as one.
We are not convinced the court below erred in its conclusion that a proper judicial determination of the controversies between the parties would be facilitated by an opportunity for a broader inquiry into the facts than is presented by the bare pleadings; therefore it did not err in discharging plaintiff’s rules: Griffith v. Sitgreaves, 81* Pa. 378; Marquis v. McKay, 216 Pa. 307; Beck v. Schekter, 235 Pa. 253; County Savings Bank v. Gillette, 273 Pa. 262.
The orders appealed from are affirmed.