In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated February 27, 2002, which granted the defendants’ respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the injured plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.
The defendants each made a prima facie showing that the injured plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury as a result of the subject accident within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345, 352
Furthermore, the Supreme Court properly declined to consider the physician’s affidavit improperly submitted by the plaintiff for the first time in a surreply (see CPLR 2214; Klimis v Lopez, 290 AD2d 538 [2002]; Voytek Tech. v Rapid Access Consulting, 279 AD2d 470, 471 [2001]). Florio, J.E, Krausman, Luciano, Townes and Rivera, JJ., concur.