—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking to annul a determination that he violated inmate rule 105.12 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [6] [iii] [possessing unauthorized organizational materials]). Because the petition did not raise a substantial evidence issue, Supreme Court erred in transferring the proceeding to this Court (see, CPLR 7804 [g]). Nevertheless, we address the merits of the issues raised in the interest of judicial economy (see, Matter of Moulden v Coughlin, 210 AD2d 997).
We reject petitioner’s contention that Department of Correctional Services Directive No. 4910 § V (c) (1) was violated. That directive requires that, if an inmate is removed from his or her cell prior to a search, the inmate must be allowed to observe the search. Because petitioner was in the dining room when his cell was searched for contraband and thus was not removed from his cell, there is no merit to his contention that the directive was violated (see, Matter of Barner v Goord, 252 AD2d 719, lv denied 92 NY2d 813; Matter of Scott v Coughlin, 231 AD2d 727, 728). The Hearing Officer did not err in failing