Ott v. Sweatman

Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date filed: 1895-01-21
Citations: 166 Pa. 217
Copy Citations
6 Citing Cases
Lead Opinion
Per Curiam,

The learned trial judge rightly held that the agreements, between Leiling and Ott constituted a conditional sale and pot a bailment; and hence there was no error in directing a verdict in favor of the defendant in the issue. All that can be profitably said on the controlling question in the case will be found in the able and exhaustive opinion of the court below' on the rule for a new trial. On it we affirm the judgment.