Motion to amend remittitur denied. The only question of constitutional law considered and determined by the court was whether the refusal to permit the appellant to challenge by habeas corpus the validity of his conviction, was not a denial of due process. (See 290 N. Y. 751.)
People Ex Rel. Rogalski v. Martin
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Date filed: 1943-11-24
Citations: 52 N.E.2d 604, 291 N.Y. 729, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1830
Copy CitationsLead Opinion