People v. Adams

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date filed: 2004-11-15
Citations: 12 A.D.3d 523, 783 N.Y.S.2d 867, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13685
Copy Citations
1 Citing Case
Lead Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (DeRiggi, J.), rendered January 28, 2002, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he was not denied the effective assistance of counsel. Viewing the record as a whole, the defendant received meaningful representation (see People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 [1981]). The defense counsel presented a reasonable defense, interposed appropriate objections, and effectively cross-examined witnesses (see People v Wright, 8 AD3d 507, 508 [2004]; People v Washington, 5 AD3d 615 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 650 [2004]). Unsuccessful trial strategies and tactics do not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel (see People v Henry, 95 NY2d 563 [2000]).

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his convictions is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the

Page 524
weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]). Santucci, J.P., Schmidt, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.