—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Beldock, J.), rendered April 13, 1993, convicting him of attempted burglary in the third degree, criminal trespass in the third degree, criminal mischief in the fourth degree (two counts), and possession of burglar’s tools, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that the showup identification should have been suppressed. Although the defendant was identified while handcuffed and sitting in a
We have considered the defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, O’Brien and Krausman, JJ., concur.