Order affirmed on the ground that an application in the nature of coram nobis is not available. (See People v. Sadness, 300 N. Y. 69, decided herewith.) No opinion.
Concur: Lotjghran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Bbomley, JJ.
Order affirmed on the ground that an application in the nature of coram nobis is not available. (See People v. Sadness, 300 N. Y. 69, decided herewith.) No opinion.
Concur: Lotjghran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Bbomley, JJ.