This is an application by the above-named petitioner for a writ of error coram nobis. This court has read the entire record in this case including the answering affidavit submitted by the District Attorney’s office in opposition to the application and the affidavit of the petitioner’s assigned counsel which sets forth certain reasons questioning the validity of the remedy presently pursued by the petitioner.
By virtue of the original commitment to the Eastern Correctional Institution, this court was and still is divested of jurisdiction over the matter (Correction Law, §§ 438, 440). It would appear that the petitioner’s application to this court in the nature of a writ of error of coram nobis is not the proper remedy. If the petitioner wishes to test the validity of Ms present confinement at Dannemora State Hospital, he must do so by means of a "writ of habeas corpus which must be initiated in the judicial district wherein Dannemora State Hospital is located. Likewise, if the petitioner seeks release from Ms present confinement, his sole remedy is by application to the Commissioner of Mental Hygiene, pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 87 of the Mental Hygiene Law.
In view of the foregoing, this court must deny the present application in the nature of a writ of error coram nobis on the grounds that it is an improper remedy.