FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 25 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
REBECCA CORPUS ESTEBAN, No. 08-71141
Petitioner, Agency No. A019-703-413
v.
MEMORANDUM *
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
**
Submitted October 19, 2010
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Rebecca Corpus Esteban, a native and the citizen of the Philippines,
petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her
appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for
cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
de novo claims of constitutional violations in immigration proceedings,
Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003), and we deny the petition for
review.
The IJ did not violate Esteban’s due process rights where the proceedings
were not “so fundamentally unfair that [she] was prevented from reasonably
presenting [her] case.” Colmenar v. INS, 210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir. 2000)
(citation omitted). Moreover, Esteban failed to demonstrate that additional
testimony may have affected the outcome of the proceedings. See id. (requiring
prejudice to prevail on a due process challenge).
Esteban’s remaining contentions are unavailing.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
2 08-71141