—In a consolidated action/ proceeding to recover damages for personal injuries, etc. (Matter No. 1), and pursuant to CPLR article 75 to confirm an arbitration award (Matter No. 2), the petitioner appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feinberg, J.), dated December 22, 1994, which, sua sponte, recalled and vacated an earlier order of the same court, dated September 26, 1994, which, inter alia, granted the petitioner’s cross motion to modify and reduce the arbitration award to $50,000, and (2) an order of the same court, also dated December 22, 1994, which granted the respondent’s motion to confirm the arbitration award of $100,000 and denied its cross motion.
Ordered that, on the Court’s own motion, the appellant’s notice of appeal from the order dated December 22, 1994, which sua sponte recalled and vacated the order dated September 26, 1994, is treated as an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal from that order is granted {see, CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further,
Ordered that the orders are reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, and the order dated September 26, 1994, is reinstated.
It is well settled that a trial court has no revisory or appellate jurisdiction to vacate, sua sponte, its own order (see, CPLR
In light of the foregoing determination, we need not consider the parties’ remaining contentions. Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Friedmann, JJ., concur.