NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
REMBRANDT GAMING TECHNOLOGIES, LP,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
BOYD GAMING CORPORATION, WMS GAMING,
INC., LVGV, LLC,
Defendants-Appellees
NEW CASTLE CORP., RAMPARTS, INC.,
MANDALAY CORP., CIRCUS CIRCUS CASINOS,
INC., VICTORIA PARTNERS, BELLAGIO, LLC,
MGM GRAND HOTEL, LLC, THE MIRAGE CASINO-
HOTEL, NEW YORK-NEW YORK HOTEL &
CASINO, LLC, ARIA RESORT & CASINO
HOLDINGS, LLC, CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT
OPERATING COMPANY, INC.,
Defendants
______________________
2016-2249
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Nevada in No. 2:12-cv-00775-MMD-GWF,
Judge Miranda M. Du.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
RACHEL ZIMMERMAN SCOBIE, Merchant & Gould P.C.,
Minneapolis, MN, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also
represented by RACHEL C. HUGHEY, CHRISTOPHER C.
DAVIS, CHRISTOPHER J. SORENSON, EMILY WESSELS;
JEFFREY BLAKE, Atlanta, GA.
TIMOTHY COLIN MEECE, Banner & Witcoff, Ltd.,
Chicago, IL, argued for defendants-appellees. Also repre-
sented by CHRISTOPHER GALFANO, MICHAEL JOSEPH
HARRIS, AUDRA CAROL EIDEM HEINZE, BRYAN MEDLOCK,
JR.; DAVID P. ENZMINGER, Winston & Strawn LLP, Menlo
Park, CA; PATRICK MICHAEL MCCARTHY, Howard &
Howard Attorneys, PLLC, Ann Arbor, MI.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, O’MALLEY, and REYNA, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
August 21, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
Rembrandt Gaming Technologies v. Boyd Gaming Corporation
Combined Opinion