Robert D. O'Connell, P. C. v. Schlegel Corp.

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date filed: 1994-11-16
Citations: 209 A.D.2d 1003, 619 N.Y.S.2d 989
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Lead Opinion

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to plaintiffs in accordance with the follow

Page 1004
ing Memorandum: Supreme Court properly determined the issues concerning title to the disputed shares of stock and we affirm the first two ordering paragraphs of the order appealed from for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Stander, J.). We modify the order, however, by vacating the third ordering paragraph and by dismissing the first counterclaim of intervenor-defendant. Upon our review of the record, we conclude that intervenor-defendant failed to present proof sufficient to demonstrate the amount of money allegedly advanced to plaintiffs. (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Stander, J.—Stock Ownership.) Present— Green, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Callahan and Doerr, JJ.