Schemmp v. State

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jimmie Schemmp (Movant) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Boost your productivity today

Delegate legal research to Cetient AI. Ask AI to search, read, and cite cases and statutes.