IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MIDDLE DISTRICT
EDWARD J. SCHOCK, : No. 609 MAL 2017
:
Petitioner :
: Petition for Allowance of Appeal from
: the Order of the Commonwealth Court
v. :
:
:
CITY OF LEBANON, :
:
Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 27th day of December, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of
Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Where subsection 5(f)(2) of the Neighborhood Improvement District
Act, Act of December 20, 2000, P.L. 949, No. 130 provides for veto
of a final plan “[i]f 40% or more of the affected property owners
within the proposed NID [neighborhood improvement district]
register their disapproval,” is the term “affected property owners
within the proposed NID” limited to the owners of properties to be
assessed under the plan or does the term include the owners of all
properties that are within the physical boundaries of the district?