The defendant's purpose of keeping the girl as his mistress was not "the purpose of prostitution" within the meaning of Gen. Laws, c. 274, s. 10.
Exceptions sustained.
CLARK, J., did not sit: the others concurred. *Page 580
State v. Brow
Court: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date filed: 1888-06-05
Citations: 15 A. 216, 64 N.H. 577
Copy CitationsLead Opinion