Legal Research AI

State v. Dunlap

Court: New Mexico Supreme Court
Date filed: 1925-12-14
Citations: 242 P. 449, 31 N.M. 275
Copy Citations
2 Citing Cases
Lead Opinion

Each of the defendants in the above-entitled causes was convicted under sections 1 and 2, c. 118, Laws of 1923, which, as we have just held in State v. Armstrong, No. 2947, 242 P. 440, not as yet [officially] reported, are violative of section 18, art. 4, of the Constitution of this state. The judgment in each of said causes must therefore be reversed and remanded, with direction to discharge the accused.