[Cite as State v. Jones, 2012-Ohio-6262.]
COURT OF APPEALS
LICKING COUNTY, OHIO
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
STATE OF OHIO : JUDGES:
: Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, P.J.
Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon. John W. Wise, J.
: Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, J.
-vs- :
:
ROBERT E. JONES : Case No. 12CA0054
:
Defendant-Appellant : OPINION
CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Appeal from the Court of Common
Pleas, Case No. 87CR16767
JUDGMENT: Affirmed
DATE OF JUDGMENT: December 24, 2012
APPEARANCES:
For Plaintiff-Appellee For Defendant-Appellant
JUSTIN T. RADIC CHRISTOPHER M. SHOOK
20 South second Street 33 West Main Street
4th Floor P.O. Box 4190
Newark, OH 43055 Newark, OH 43058-4190
ROBERT E. JONES, PRO SE
P.O. Box 5500
Chillicothe, OH 45601
LIcking County, Case No. 12CA0054 2
Farmer, J.
{¶1} On March 17, 1988, appellant, Robert Jones, pled guilty to three counts of
rape with specifications in violation of R.C. 2907.02 and 2941.14.2. By judgment entry
filed same date, the trial court sentenced appellant to an indeterminate term of ten to
twenty-five years on each count, to be served consecutively.
{¶2} On September 9, 2002, a hearing was held to determine appellant's status
pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act, R.C. Chapter 2950 (Megan's Law). By
judgment entry filed same date, the trial court classified appellant as a sexual predator.
{¶3} On April 20, 2012, appellant filed a motion to vacate registration
requirements. By judgment entry filed June 20, 2012, the trial court denied said motion.
{¶4} Appellant filed a pro se appeal and assigned the following error:
I
{¶5} "WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY
REOPENING A FINAL VALID JUDGMENT."
{¶6} On October 1, 2012, Attorney Christopher Shook filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). In said brief, Attorney Shook set forth a
potential error that could be raised, but concluded there was no legal basis for same.
Contemporaneous with the filing of the Anders brief, counsel requested to withdraw.
Attorney Shook assigned the following potential error:
ANDERS I
{¶7} "THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR IN ITS
DETERMINATION TO DENY APPELLANT'S MOTION TO VACATE REGISTRATION
REQUIREMENTS."
LIcking County, Case No. 12CA0054 3
I, ANDERS I
{¶8} These assignments challenge the trial court's determination to "reopen"
the case to classify appellant as a sexual predator and to deny his motion to vacate
registration requirements. We disagree with the arguments herein.
{¶9} On March 17, 1988, appellant pled guilty to three counts of rape and was
sentenced to an indeterminate term of ten to twenty-five years on each count, to be
served consecutively. Appellant did not appeal his sentence.
{¶10} On September 9, 2002, a hearing was held to determine appellant's status
pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act, R.C. Chapter 2950 (Megan's Law). By
judgment entry filed same date, the trial court classified appellant as a sexual predator.
Appellant did not appeal his classification.
{¶11} On April 20, 2012, appellant filed a motion to vacate registration
requirements, arguing ex post facto laws and the Supreme Court of Ohio's decision in
State v. Williams, 129 Ohio St.3d 344, 2011-Ohio-3374. The Williams court found the
Adam Walsh Act, the successor to Megan's Law, violated the ex post facto clause of the
Ohio Constitution.
{¶12} We note the Williams court did not overrule its prior decisions on the
constitutionality of Megan's Law vis-à-vis ex post facto laws. See, State v. Cook, 83
Ohio St.3d 404 (1998); State v. Wilson, 113 Ohio St.3d 382, 2007-Ohio-2202; State v.
Ferguson, 120 Ohio St.3d 7, 2008-Ohio-4824. In addition, this court upheld the
retroactive imposition of a sex offender classification upon an offender under Megan's
Law. See, State v. Wilson, 5th Dist. No. 2011CA00266, 2012-Ohio-2164.
LIcking County, Case No. 12CA0054 4
{¶13} The Anders court established five criteria which must be met before a
motion to withdraw by appellate counsel may be granted. The five criteria are: (1) a
showing that appellant's counsel thoroughly reviewed the transcript and record in the
case before determining the appeal to be frivolous; (2) a showing that a motion to
withdraw by appellant's counsel was filed; (3) the existence of a brief by appellant's
counsel raising any potential assignments of error that can be argued on appeal; (4) a
showing that appellant's counsel provided a copy of the brief which was filed to the
appellant; and (5) a showing that appellant's counsel provided appellant adequate
opportunity to file a pro se brief raising any additional assignments of error appellant
believes the court should address. Anders at 744.
{¶14} Upon review, we find these five criteria have been met. Pursuant to
Anders at 744:
***the court-not counsel-then proceeds, after a full examination of all the
proceedings, to decide whether the case is wholly frivolous. If it so finds it
may grant counsel's request to withdraw and dismiss the appeal insofar as
federal requirements are concerned, or proceed to a decision on the
merits, if state law so requires. On the other hand, if it finds any of the
legal points arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous) it must,
prior to decision, afford the indigent the assistance of counsel to argue the
appeal.
LIcking County, Case No. 12CA0054 5
{¶15} This court has made a full examination of all the proceedings and finds no
error by the trial court. The trial court's classification of appellant was in compliance
with the law.
{¶16} Based upon our review, we find this appeal to be frivolous, grant Attorney
Shook's motion to withdraw, and affirm the trial court's decisions.
{¶17} Assignments of Error I and Anders I are denied.
{¶18} The judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Licking County, Ohio is
hereby affirmed.
By Farmer, J.
Delaney, P.J. and
Wise, J. concur.
s/ Sheila G. Farmer_______________
s/ Patricia A. Delaney_____________
s/ John W. Wise__________________
JUDGES
SGF/db 1205
[Cite as State v. Jones, 2012-Ohio-6262.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR LICKING COUNTY, OHIO
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
STATE OF OHIO :
:
Plaintiff-Appellee :
:
-vs- : JUDGMENT ENTRY
:
ROBERT E. JONES :
:
Defendant-Appellant : CASE NO. 12CA0054
For the reasons stated in our accompanying Memorandum-Opinion, the
judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Licking County, Ohio is affirmed. Costs to
appellant.
s/ Sheila G. Farmer_______________
s/ Patricia A. Delaney_____________
s/ John W. Wise__________________
JUDGES
State v. Jones
Combined Opinion