Understand the law with legal research AI

State v. Puryear

Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date filed: 1976-12-07
Citations: 230 S.E.2d 678, 291 N.C. 325, 1976 N.C. LEXIS 991
Copy Citations
6 Citing Cases
Combined Opinion
230 S.E.2d 678 (1976)
291 N.C. 325

STATE of North Carolina
v.
Earl V. PURYEAR.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 7, 1976.

Ragsdale, Liggett & Cheshire, for defendant.

Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., Thomas B. Wood, Asst. Atty. Gen., for State.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, 30 N.C.App. 719, 228 S.E.2d 536. Denied. Motion of the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question. Allowed.

Understand legal concepts and procedures, draft documents, and conduct in-depth analysis.

No signup required.