Opinion issued October 17, 2013
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-12-00944-CV
———————————
STEPHEN MCLEMORE, III, Appellant
V.
PROGRESSIVE COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee
On Appeal from the 55th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 2012-10964
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an attempted appeal from a default judgment signed August 3, 2012.
No motion for new trial was filed. Appellant, Stephen McLemore, filed his notice
of appeal on October 3, 2012.
If no timely motion for new trial is filed, the notice of appeal is due within
30 days after the judgment is signed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. In a restricted appeal,
however, the notice of appeal must be filed within six months after the judgment is
signed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(c). A restricted appeal is available to a party who did
not participate, either in person or through counsel, in the hearing that resulted in
the judgment complained of and who did not timely file a postjudgment motion or
request for findings of fact and conclusions of law. TEX. R. APP. P. 30.
Appellant’s notice of appeal does not comply with the requirements for
proceeding as a restricted appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(d)(7). Specifically, the
notice (1) does not “state that the appellant is a party affected by the trial court’s
judgment but did not participate—either in person or through counsel—in the
hearing that resulted in the judgment complained of,” (2) does not “state that the
appellant did not timely file either a postjudgment motion, request for findings of
fact and conclusions of law, or notice of appeal,” and (3) is not verified by
appellant. Id.
On July 19, 2013, this Court notified appellant of his failure to comply with
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.1 and instructed appellant to file an
amended notice of appeal within 10 days of the date of the notice. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 25.1(g). Appellant was also notified that failure to file an amended notice
2
of appeal would result in dismissal of his appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 42.3(a). Appellant did not file an amended notice of appeal.
Additionally, appellant has neither paid the required fees nor established
indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also
TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013); Order
Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of
Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket
No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1).
After being notified on May 3, 2013 that this appeal was subject to dismissal,
appellant did not respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 42.3(c).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction and for
nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Massengale.
3