granting or denying the motion to this court within 30 days. Thus,
respondent asserts that this court should either treat the district court's
certification order as an order granting NRCP 60(b) relief, or enter an
order informing the district court that it already has jurisdiction to rule on
that motion based on the limited remand.
Having considered the parties' filings, we conclude that
remand is warranted and grant appellant's motion. Although the
February 6 limited remand order directed the district court to rule on
appellant's NRCP 60(b) motion, no written order granting that motion has
been entered in the district court, and we decline to treat the district
court's certification order as an order granting NRCP 60(b) relief.
Additionally, the district court has transmitted to this court the
certification order entered on limited remand, such that jurisdiction is
again vested in this court. Accordingly, we
ORDER this matter REMANDED to the district court so that
it can enter a written order resolving the NRCP 60(b) motion in
accordance with its certification. 2
Parraguirre V ' Cherry
2 This
order constitutes the final disposition in this appeal. Any
appeal from the district court's decision below shall be docketed as a new
matter.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A
1111111111111111 MUM EAN
cc: Second Judicial District Court Dept. 10
Wm. Patterson Cashill, Settlement Judge
Scarpello & Huss, Ltd.
Aaron & Paternoster, Ltd.
Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(0) 1947A
EV