—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Kane, J.), entered September 3, 1992 in Sullivan County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the State Board of Parole revoking petitioner’s parole.
As the result of his conviction of the crimes of manslaughter in the first degree and assault in the second degree, petitioner
Petitioner contends that his waiver of counsel was invalid because it was not knowing or intelligent. This contention must be rejected. The record of the proceedings reveals that petitioner was given the opportunity to seek legal counsel and was advised of the manner in which counsel could assist him with his case. Petitioner was fully aware of the ramifications of waiving legal assistance and, hence, we find that his waiver was voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently made. Under the circumstances presented, we further find that the Parole Board did not abuse its discretion in imposing upon petitioner a seven-year time period before he would be reconsidered for release on parole.
Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.