Legal Research AI

United States v. Beall

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date filed: 2002-06-19
Citations: 37 F. App'x 668
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Combined Opinion
                             UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                             No. 02-6601



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus


RAYMOND MCARTHUR BEALL,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at New Bern. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (CR-95-57-F)


Submitted:   June 13, 2002                  Decided:   June 19, 2002


Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Raymond McArthur Beall, Appellant Pro Se.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Raymond McArthur Beall appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for review of sentence.   We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court.   See United States v. Beall, No. CR-95-57-F (E.D.N.C. Mar.

19, 2002).    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.




                                                          AFFIRMED




                                 2