Legal Research AI

United States v. Jermmie Davis

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date filed: 2012-12-27
Citations: 504 F. App'x 336
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases

     Case: 12-10281       Document: 00512095349         Page: 1     Date Filed: 12/27/2012




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                        December 27, 2012
                                     No. 12-10281
                                   Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JERMMIE MARQUIS DAVIS,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 3:11-CR-235-1


Before SMITH, PRADO, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jermmie Davis has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Davis has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief, rele-
vant portions of the record reflected therein, and Davis’s response. We concur
with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.


       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.