United States v. Lumpkins

Court: Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Date filed: 2011-04-20
Citations: 70 M.J. 91, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 334
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Lead Opinion

CCA 201000554. Review granted on the following issue:

WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDING IN UNITED STATES v. RESENDIZ-PONCE AND RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S RECENT OPINIONS IN MEDINA, MILLER, AND JONES.

No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.