. . . ..
%..:r.*
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF T’EXAS
AUSTIN
Honorable%* E, Elliott,P.&. )
judgew atlol1.h.thtloffWe. Xt is obtiouo that
the l~~irlatur.cti.lgwdLy p1m.A th olp~lntiry,
p a woin
r th edietriatju4 x&her
a a th winthe so *
o r o t Lik 4 wl
ml~o lo a aourt. EM
w p o wo to
x dlo R o n-
tfnus the sarrloer or t&a auditin- was *issly pIme
with auah jud@ rsthni t&m wiul t&e oourt. The
ofrloeof mudltarhas tba moot Irrtlsmtordatlm
to tbe aotionaof the .odsslonero~ oorirtand th.
oomalrolworo 8homoolveo. It lo of Oh* highoat
pall. OOaQm timt 4u4h en 02210.rbo left .atlr.-
ty in4 tram the eontraL of then oSSlO.ra,mm
tc the eotont of a poeoiblcrwov%l by th. Aloeon-
tlnuanao of the Authr or his ftmu. h lcilithn
it Is of gmrt ;&tlioieportenoetE6t e lkUleu d
experl~n.eQarfioeraf thlo klad, 8lred7 halkr
dth the finsno~al.onution8 of t&o oouat7as& it.
Euolnooo,rhooldnot be #bJaet*a to t&o podblo
reoultrof raoh biennial.lootlon, tt IO our 07i.n.
loa that WEen the .owi.oriau4ro'oouro owe tRk.0
aotloswhleh 10.6. to tho rypolntmmt of an aoditor
GOT a 04uat7, owh 00 10 retems to ia Artlab
1646, 8UOh OOwty, a@ for 80 th0 0#100 IO OQ~O~H&OA,
we th6 rppolntaont of Ott*.&&.ntthw..i10 ow-
owned btmmee uwtLy like ooantieo AeaQpatrteA
in Artf.1.1665; subjest to tho porrsr of the Ai*
tr io sjudgl
el~no to ~lowntinuo i&o aorrio*o Qz
euoh wAltor in the wuin.r.. pr0vid.Uin Artfel.
1646.”
In do* of th. fo ofa& it lo bho opialoaoi
thle 4epRraunt that tho 41otr T et judeo ~Qmo ho tb #ow4r
Do Alooontlauo the sonioeo OX owk auditor In the mnn1op as
ia trtloloIti& Tesnb~~ebnstatod
provi.doA Gtvil -?ktateot
Tmaoting th%t the Soreuol4q SULLY awworo Jour in-
&.r7, we are
Yvu?. YeFy tstl1y
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Combined Opinion