Webb, Willard K

Date: June 4, 2015

Attn: Abel Acosta,
Clerk of the Texas
Court of Crimina]. Appeals
P.OB. 12308! Capitol Station
Austin, Tx. 78711

RE: Relator's First Writ of Mandamus

Cause No: 1278106
Style: The State of Texas v. Willard K. Webb

Dear C1 e r..- k ;
Please find enclosed Relator's First Writ of Mandamus
t:o be filed with the pr'Yper Court for review .;md disposition.
Thank you for your time and assistance in this matter.

Cordially, '/, ~
/s/~
Willard K. Webb #1713120
ALLRED UNIT
2101 FM 369 N.
Iowa Park, Tx. 76367

RECEIVED IN
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

JUN 08.2015
CC: file/WKW

Abe\ Acosta, Clert<
 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

§
EX PARTEi § CAUSE NO: 1278106
WILLARD K. WEBB § APPEAL NO: 01-ll-00403-CR
v. §
THE 179th JUDICIAL § PDR NO: Unknow I filed on
DISTRICT COURT OF § June 1, 2012
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS §
HON. JUDGE PRESIDING; §
DISTRICT CLERK OF §
HARRIS COUNTY, CHRIS DANIEL.; §
CHIEF DISTKICT ATTORNET, Michael§
Anderson, FOR HARRIS COUNTY
TEXAS.

RELATORS PRIST APPLICATION ~OR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

• .. ·.. : ...,,

' TO TH~ HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

Comes now, WILLARD K. WEBB, EX PARTE, in the above styled cause
of action and proce~ding files this first Application For Wirt MAN=
DAMUS, pursuant to ARTICLE 1, § 9 of the TEXAS CONSTITUTIONAL and
the TEXAS RULES of APPELAmES PROCEDURE.

In support of this complint the relator will sho.w that he has
a legal right secured under, including, but not necessarily limited
to, Article 1, § 12, to the texas coristitution Article 1, § 9, the
first, fifth, and fourteenth Amendments to the United States Contitu-
tion, as well as the mandatory provision set forth by the Texas Leg-
islature under Article 10.07, section 1-7 and that the State has a
legal duty to perform in this action.

Relator will also s~ that the state th~ough its agents/officials
doing business in the State of Texas, Southern District, under colot
of State law and/or office, either acted in concert one with the other
in order to advance or further a common scheme or goal to deprive Rel-
'-· .:.:.• . ...
ator of his liberty interest, due process of law, equal protection
right, and other, and other ri0hts and/or priviledges secured under
the United States Constitution ~nd/or laws of the United State and
the State of Texas.

I.

Relator, WILLARD K. WEBB, TDCJ # 1713120, is illegaly restra-
ined of his liberty by the Texa3 Department of Criminal Justice-c~r­
cectional Institutioal Division at the : JAMES v. ALLRED Unit, lo~ated
in IOWA PARK, TEXAS-WICHITA COUNTY, following conviction by Jiry trial

1.
 D D
on or about February 23, 2012, in the !79th Ju.ict~ll~istrict court
of HARRIS County, HJUSTON TEXAS under cause no: 127810Q and; Subse-
quently sentenced to a term of (45) Years imprisonment for the felo~y
offense of murd~r.
Relator has exhausted his rimedies in an attempt to exercise his
rights secured under both the T€xas State Constit:~tion and the United
States Constitution pertaining to the Writ of Habeas Corpus and has
no other adequate State remedy available to him in this action to compel
the ~tate and its AGENTS~OFFICIALS to fulfil thier minis~erial duties
specificallyi but not limited to, provioing the Relator with the rele-
vant information pertaining to cause No:l278106 in order for Relator
to abtain th~ necessary Trial Transcript, CLERKS RECORD, and EXHIBITS
but not limited to, filed in the HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERKS Office
and in the Custody of ~he HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK: CHRIS DANIELj,
The acl sought to be completed is ministerial, not Discretionary
in natur.e, as it is stated in the Texas code of Criminal Procedure
Articla 2. 21- duty o:l: Clerks.
As of June 2, 2015 the District Clerk has failed to cornpl.ywith
Relators prior requests for an itemized inventory of the Records,
Doc~ments and EXHIBITS, but not limited to, filed and in custody of
CHRIS DANIELS under cause NO: 1278106/STATE OF TEXAS V. WILLARD K.
WEBB, also; failed to comply w·i th Relators prior requests and inquiries
aa to the "total fees'' ewquired bythe office of the Dictrict Clerk
in oraer for Relator to purchase copies of the requested Records,
Documents and EXHIBITS, but not kexexkasxim~iNge~x®NxReiat®xsxEi~kkxk®
limited to. The District Clerks Deliberate delay here has inpinged on
Relators right to prepare and file his state 11.07 Writ of Habeas Cor-
pus, challenging the V&lidity of his Conviction.

II.

Relator here in cause NO: 1273106-first requested information
and Records properly to the District Clerk of HARRIS COUNTY, in about
Septemb•?r of 2013, (See; Relators EXHIBIT~-' '~ncertified copy).
Relators Second inquiry and re1uest for information and Records pro-
perly to the Distr ic i: Clerk of .HARRIS COUNTY on February 25, 2014,
specifically requesting an "Itemized Index of the statements of facts
and Transcripts in Cause NO: 1278106 " (See, Relators EXHIBIT~: re-
quest to CHRIS DANIEALI Dated 2-25-2014);
Relators Third inquiry and request for information and records,
but not limited to properly to the Distrct Cl~rk office file Date
stamped on April 24, 2015 (See, Relators EXHIBIT 3. letter addre-
ssed to CHRIS DANIELl District Clerk Date Aerill7-; 2015);
Relators Fourth inquiry and request f~r trial Transcripts andre-
cords by 'day of "motion" to the Honorable Judge Presiding in the ,l 79th
Judicial District Court on or about A-PRi'1 fl(l 1 2015. (Relator is u,qable
'!J·
to provide this Court with a copy of said Motion) .fGt::t;i t2-ei~JN £X,
AS of JUne 4, 2015, the State and its Agents/O~ficials have
failed to reply to and take action in fulfilling RElators requests,

2.
therefore, violating his constitutional and statutory right~ to seek
Habeas relief by way of the District Clerks office of Harris County.
The District Clerks unecessary and deliberte delay and noncompliance
of its ministerial duties deprive Relator of liberty interests, Due
process of law, equal protection right and other priviledges ace-·
corded under Article 1,§ 9 to the u.s. constitution and Article 1, i 12
of the Texas Constitution, through and by knowingly and intentionally
Falling to abide bu, artd to thereby violate by acts of ommission,
statutes and/br codes of the State of Texas govering said rigfts
and/o~ priviledges, aS well as laws of the United States. The State
th~ough its agents/officials willful and intentional failure to ~i~e
abicje by the statutory procedures authorized by the Texas legis-
latilre injures Relator right to the Writ Habeas Corpus as guaranteed
by th~~ United States Constitution and only benefits the State and pre-
judices the Relator.
Said same named agents/officials below for this purposes of tfuis
complaint are State actors doing business ir1 the State of Texaa, sou-
t~ern District, Harris County under color of State law and/or office
either acting in concert one wj.th the other in order to advance or
further a common scheme or goal to deprive Relator of his Constitu-
tional rights to the Writ of Habe~s COrpus and have failed to take
preventative or corrective measures while having the opportunity to
do so.

III.
PARTIES

1. State agents/officials-Chris Daniel i~ the District Clerk of
Harris County, Texas acting in his official capa~ity M.r aaniel
has authority to promulgate policies, rules, regulations, procedures,
and practices governi~g the operation and daily operation of the
office of the Harris Countv District Clerks office. Through his
duties, Mr. Daniel conducts business throughout the State. in-
cluding the sotithern District.

2. State agents~/official-Hon KRISTIN M. GUINEY is a Judge of
the !79th Judicial District Court of Harris Count¥, Texas, acting
in her official capacity, the Honorable Kristin M. Guiney has the
authority to promulgate policies, rules, regulations, procedures,
and prctices for the operation and daily operation of the !79th
Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas. Through her i]uties
the Honorable Kristin M. Guinev is conducting business throughout
the St~te-including the Southern-Federal District of Texas.

The above ;nentioned officials/agents of the State have failed
to abide by the mandat(>ry language of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure
Articles 11.07 et seq., and Article 2.21--Dtity of Clerk.

Relator alleges the States officials/agents jointly and severally,
each have a high ~egree of education along with a duty and of
obligation to kno~ the law; thereby establishing the States officials/
agents acterl knowingly.~~~eiat~~ further alle~es the States agents/

•3
officials acted knowingly and failed to take preventive measures to
correct wrongful acts when having the opportunity to do so, this
also establishes by silence and ommissions they acted in concert one
with the other with the intent to cause the damage and injury of
impediment to Relator and Relator's·rights, priviledges, and immunities
secured unde~, including, but not necessarily limited to, Article I,
§ 12, to th~ Texas Constitution, Article I, § 9, the First, Fifth,
and Fourteenth Amendments to the UnJted States Constitution, by violating
the ;aandatory provisions set forth by the Texas Legislature under
Article 11.07, et seq., and Article 2.21 of the Texas Code of Criminal
Procedure, in failing to perform their duties and obligations in
following the mandatory language of Article 11.07, et seq., and
Article 2.21 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, causing
irreparable damage, h~rm and injury to Relator and his right
to a writ of habeas. corpus under both the Texas Constitution
and the United States Constitution.
The Texas Constitution at Article I, § 12 provides: "The
Writ of Habeas Corpus is a writ of right, and shall never be
suspended. Th~ Legislature shall enact laws to render the remedy
speedy and effectual."

The United States Constitution, Article I,§ 9, also holds:
''The privilede of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended
unless in cases of rebellion the public safety may require it."

The State through its agents/officials herein are State
actorS doing b~siness und~r color of law and/or office, acted
with the intent to deprive Relator by practice and/or custom,
of rights and privildges protected by the Constitutio~ and laws
of the United States by failing to abide by, and thereby provide
Relator Due Process of law and the Equal Protection of l~w,
by circumventing th~ Te~as Code of Criminal Procedure, Artitle
11.07 et seq,, and Article 2.21-Duties of Clerk .

. IV

Article 11.07 Sections 3 (b)(c)(d), and Sections 6 and
7, and Article 2.21-Duties of Clerk of the Texas Code of Criminal
Procedure were emasculated by t~1e State's agents/officials when the
mandatory language contained therein, time frames, and procedures
were ignored and/or neglected when the Harris Counties' District
Clerks Office and the States agent/official namely: _Chris Daniel,
but not limited tb,has knowingly and intentionally refused to
provide Relator here with the necessary information as requested
(See; Relator's Exhibits 1-4), in order and for the purpose of
Relator seeking his Post ~viction Remedies via an Article 11.07
State writ of Habeas Corpus upon final conviction of his State
Conviction and Sentence. The Stat~s agents/officials knowing and
intentional acts to circumvent time frames and procedures were
designed and purposed to cause Rel~tor damage and injury .

.4
 In this cause the States agents/officials have substituted time
frames and procedures of their own creation which had not been
approved nor autho~ized by the Texas Legislature~
Through prejudicial overt act.~, material omissions, material
misrepresentations;. and acts .of deceit and moral turpitude,
compounded by guilty knowledge, the State agents/official:3 have
promulgated and substituted alternative procedures to those
authorized and enacted into law by the Texas Legislature.
Article 11.07 et seq., was circumvented by the States agents/officials
when implementation was frustrated by the adoption of an alternative
Get of procedures.
Evidence of moral turpitude can be drawn from these unauthorized
time frames and procedures. Moral turpitude contemplates acts
which tend to betray in an evil and dishonorable manner. The
i'
Legislature as well as Federal courts have been mislead to believe
the time frames ancl 9rovisions implemented by the State are . I

those authorized by Article 11.07 et seq., and Article 2~21,
when such is not the case. The State through its agents/officials
enjoy a license to exercise unfettered and unchecked discretion.
Outwardly, theSe time frames and procedures appear to be
legitimate. Only a person thoroughly acquainted with l~~~and
procedure would pick up the fatal flaw they incorporate~ Th~
State created the app~arnce of extending Relator's rights. to
a writ of habeas corpus: to camouflage the fact that ther~were
no actual provisions or time frames as set forth by the actual
Article 2.21-Duties of Clerk being followed. It is dishonest
to provide the outward appearnace that an actual right to a·
writ of habeas corpus was being extended and granted, when ,
you know the provisions and time frames are unauthorized and
therefore, counterfeit.

.v
The Texas Legislature in ocder to carry out the mandate
of the Texas Constitution Article I, § 12 andArticle I, § 9
of the United States Constitution, has decreed, via V.T.A.C.C.P.,
Article 11.07, every person whose liberty is under restraint
by way of a final conviction has the right/priviledge to the
writ of habeas corpu~ in order to determine the nature and cause
for the restraint thereof, and to be discharged from such said
restraint if determined illegal.
Through prejudicial overt acts, material omissions, material
misrepresentations and act~ of deceit and moral turpitude, compounded
by guilty knowledge, the State through its agents/officials
acting in their official capacities have a practice of holding
star chamber like proceedings rather han .the proceedings authorized
under V.T.A.C.C.P., Articles 11.07 et sQq., and Article 2.21-
Duties of Clerk and Article I, § 12 of the Texas Constitution
and Article I, § 9 to the United States Constitution.
As a result of practices by the State actor(s), relator
has been denied his right/priviledge to acces3 to the necessary
ano fundamental trial transcripts, r:ecords and exhibits that

.5
arc~ cr~-~ial to the prepe:.r ing and filing of Relator's Post Convict ion
State 11.07 et seq., Writ of Habeas Corpus in a timely manner.
The a£~rementioned, documents and in~ormation are controll~d
by and in the c~sto~y of the District Clerk's Off1ce of Harris _-
County-Houston, Texas namely: Chris Daniel. The District Clerk',s·~ __,_'\· .. _ · · ··
misconduct h.:,':''"~'{·b1\
W:r'f.'lf;' of .. Habe.·as _:.Corpus. Th1s Honorable court has the':,'a~ud_lclal"·· - '· _ ·
po~~r ~nf 'Harris County District Clerks :9Jf./c~}?:J~[:,f;';':;"_;:j_
District Attorney's office and the Hon. Judge of the l79t'h;~\j-{_i'(f:i,9;,~1a.'1!;:~·'.::V:~·
District Court I to fulfill. its legal ministerial d'uties' un:q~):f?\~!HtiftL' "':~
the provisions set_ forth in the V.T.A.C.C.P. 11.07 et··#.[~4sr!~~~:.::~':\-
and Article 2.21-Duties of Clerk. :?\;::i~->.,.,'..-\,,
~ '·i~::·~ _;.~ :~\ ~~.!~~~. . .(
SIGNED AND EXECUTED ON THIS DATE: June 4th of 2015. ..: .
... -.: .,

·'.
Respectfully Submitted;

/sl-tt4/k//LV..dl
(Rel~to~-Ex Parte, Willard K.' Webb)

Will~rd K. Webb #1713120
ALLRED UNIT
·'
-'.·

~'-~- ~-J·:~;~ . . '':2101 FM 369 N.
. . ~t~ ...~- .
;f-:-::tOWA PARK I TX. 7636 7
.I' .... ,, ·.·'.

....
·

..... :
·
,.,;
,y'' ....

,·.
-~ f • '•.
l
'·

CC: File/WKW .fi
~- * '

.•·.
 APPENDIX OF EXHIBITS
IN SUPPORT OF
RELATOR'S APPLICATION FOR
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
(EXHIBITS 1-4)
RELATOR'S EXHIBIT 1
 ~~USl NO:. 10?7~/o~

.w\LL~RD w~BB .IN THE l7Cl +h" D1s·+Ric.t
vs CDlJR·t FoR
THE StATE D f ·T-EX\\S \-4A.RR\ S CDurrtY TEXAS

MoTi r~ 1ll +o o b-\- Cli n T1o ~o meJ"\t r:t nd Ior
TR~·1L Rec.ofdS I_~ t=of'm 'PRu ·pus
To t-\tf2. \-\o tu 0 \2_ PtBLE:) l) d s e... () F ~ {:~hd LolJ r·t:
Co me. S \\lDu.J, Ull LL A-R D \JJ E_~B , ·p e -\-'\ -t-~ on '? ~c:) S E:. \ 1\.l +\JLS
P._\r,ove ~nc~ ·t:are__9\Y\~ L4Se._ Af\d/or< c_.puse.cYt- AcJ-
·IoN~ Re_S'Pe~tFol\Y Re.-'1UQ.S-\-~n~ t'nls HofloRRh\e ~\)­
+
R tD P-Llc) w ~ , M ·+-o ~ \ o c_e_e_ d \f\ ·r:-o r '{Y\e:t_ ·vo._Pos \f\
b
h \S ~{(Q_ \Je-St ·\-o oh \-CA.\ f\ \R~rAL \Zec_ortl~ l CAV\cl o~e..r
doc tJ YY\ er\ t sa>
lo
·p ~.-r lone" 'n Vo ~tn~ ~R-t ~ 2o 5o And 2-ob(;, oF \Je_~­
\5
t\\o\\15 TeX. ~S · 5t0-..tlYte.S ~~uLF 127 o t: the Tt=-XJ4S -~u\e_
.. o·F V~Ac.-ttce \n ·the D~st~\c.:t- And Count/ Courts) OR-b
4o.D9 e-t. Se Ch OF .the. ·-1E IZ l=lS Code 6+- C Rtm. Pr<.oc_.T&\.
#

bYef\ Recof'd:S Ac__t. b:l51- ·lr (A) \JoT:C Pel \Uhteh sho-
LJlcl SuP'Port th,s t-\Dnr'?Rab\~ ~ooQ-\--·s Pf<-o~QR' Q-m
LPwf·D\\ J'ofZLSd ~~+-tor'\~
.
TI .
·-l h·\ S be~ r'\~ Pre.. sen teA 1vY Gcx::x:l- t- A\ +h; .So +hat
YY\ o·i-tc:> n 'S
+·he_ ·?eJ-'1-\- ·,one.\' ~n Db -t-~·t f\ Re._cord~ l=\Y\d l 01 ·+r1CAl C.OC>r-ls
\=de.~ j CA.SS. 1S \- h \ m ·\n ·+-he. ?re.·\=tA00-..\-.,of\ o t=
·i-o r-t\d O.t\d
h 1·S o.. \J'?Lt <:_&\-lot\ For w rt+ [l)':·F- \-.\-~ \oe-AS CoR. PoCO ~eltef
for ·WR\+ oF '\-\CA'o~S e_oR_Pus, ·The ·K_e.q,ues-l-eddocomen1
·-J:
 l S. ~ss ex\ t \Al foCQ. b-\lvY\ +a ~e'3eqec_h +he. GroL>rd s of Ff'Ko\6
·-\-~CA \- ~ e \ S 1Y\4-eJU c\ 'w1 G
·to RoJ'Se o

'ill
\>ettt~one\ 0-SSerts und·e(' ?enedt-1 o\= ?ef1ury--\-hqt-\v2
\ s w \t-~ o u+ the.- Fu'nc\ S. ·rro '\?er.-\-{es) \<.£C.-\ \.t t \ 6 CA0d o<'of.ha
See-ur.\i-.teS \\\ W~\e.h to PCAV fo(l -\-he_ R-eC()0<2-s+-ed doOJm61f
C\Y\cl Dr Re.C.ord So
·rhe- Do C.l) vnen~s o_nd k.e.eof'dS ShDo\d be- P·Ft=of'ClCL'o\e ~~
No CD Cb+ +o 4he ?e.t\ -\-,ol)e_\' Th\~ De_, f\~ +he_ C.u. ~ Such ~of\-\-e.n -\-\or{3; See:. Srn1+h vs/ ~e~~
n e_·t\- 5 ~ 5 U~ s '7-o9J LCLne VS. B\loW n 3 72. u. 5 . if 11', 2 3 5.(_+
I D I

·+ 6 ~) q b L o g_c\ ~ ct I (\'tJ6 )" £S·hAb \\ s\ted ~Ue.nueS, he\d btl
*'Q Su.PRe..me.. C-oo0t) ~+-#\e._ Sh\-e tS Qe_ct>Otre.dlo€St-
Qb\lS"" CAuenl.)f2-S e:>'F ,::l''PPeLLb.-t.e_ re..u~ew~ lfY\o.\(_tt\9t~l~oU:
\=unda.me1\k>..L %4- *he. Couflt.s ~s-\u\o \\s~ ~e.SQ_ uuenues
Wh\(.~ ~ \Ve.S eC(sUCA.\ 0LC..6S +-o +\\e ·~t-l ~loV\e r.
?e_-\-it-l'one.r CAS'3QMS ·+-~-\-- \ F -th~s e.ouf'-\- d€1\ \eS fut~
\Zect.,ue_'S-\- t=or ~f?. \J-er\-er\ re..c_o ,ds u.nd. or Doc..umrn~M
0€1'\~a\ tuhDu\J bQ I(\ clef ed- \)I 0 \0:.-\-taf\ 0 ~ L l ~ ~) ~VY\P-f\ ~·-­
Y\\e.nt t-o The., u, S C.o(ls..\-:-,.\-~on.,
To \YTJ \)ose 0--nY Fl,(\c\~~ eo(\d\ \,'o[)S U'Yof\ W\l) \nd\-
91-.ent -Pr t So~ e.." b t= ·~h~s 3~+-e. ~,~ ues +he pgf'3on o... r,·~-
h+~-h~ ~~ ~ ..
Fu~1-h-erme\'e. ~ . · . 4-· , ·- Soe_ ~or hLS Ltbe.r+v
(") t \~ e_ PC\ d-l D Y\ -e._ r h c.t s C\._ r ~y\-- 4:-c:J e Q( Ucd
I

~fa TE:C..IIDr\ ~ f +\r,e. \CA.u.J ' =:;ee_: L&ne. V s. ~ ~ c. .. n h
Ke.\Y\ I 4-he. C.-oCJr'\- d OUJf\ ' ....:JU t-"\C\... W e-
re..~ I=- F If lfY\e ~Q_ I='unclC\ VYle.n k\ Drt rl~-
 rr
tJe~-,·~,·onec QL~:fSQr+S ~ -\JAe_ ~ Qe~(.)eSkd vec_ods
Qnd, CJ r 'l\o C.0 m.QrJ- ~ · ·r>. f' P -e_.~S- e!\ ~l u l ~d h ,s. Y\ e..ed. ~o"
~.e._ re_LoodS lS -\-a ~SSISt ~lm tY\ +h-e_ 'fu~e_r -\'\'t\~~-\-ton
h, t=:
The.. Ve+\·hone-0 IS ~.f..,.}-\~ -b+he._ Qa_Cbl)ES{-ec~ Y'~rdsu~
C:>f' Dowm~, \fl ~ f'ci-ef' ·to
Prove "'\S ~lLe_~e;..:h~n ,/~V\dtc
be. r~lAte. tD \)reSQ.f\t ~'-S Grou""ds 0\= Ee.~~ \() o. ·kv-
CJ0altde. L\ ~h-t .
peJ-- l+lt='ll f? (' s ~s t \ + t \DrxA \ r\ S}~-\-
l) w \Ll \::J e_ l> to \ 0-,+ed
bQ.Yand Q.e 'Po.'r 't ~"'e.. \>re_Ve-f\+-ed ~m \>erfu'""g, h\'::l ~,91~
'vlt- i-b r:1 \e.. 0--. wr,+ CJ ~ UCA~~s e..o·R.'0v~, due. \-o 4-he.
l~c...."- OA.c\d ~Sene~ CJ 'F TR.\tA.\ e.our-t f eCorclS.

3[_
?e+ ~-\..\ ~ 1)-Q. r·
.e.n--kt ~ -e.d -\-o ~ e_ Sou ~+ ~1=-t-e.r ·f -e.c.ordS
lS I

CA¥Jcl VJ\Ll 'Pr-e_ ~Q..Cl+ ~\S · 'U-onCJ f'&l£1l~ (.our-\- lOt~ (?AVo. R-
-\-ttA\ L\6t a·~ th.Q_ \t-erns fuus~+:
U) A-tFtd~u, t SU.::Of'M +o beFore +\Ae_ JQ5~'tc_e o t= Peuce,
Artcl w"'\c_h tAJCA.S . ust2cl -to e:>b~lfl 0.-1\4 0.._ Q~JL6t u. x.AJr4/\\
(J.) f\J (:) m e ~ ~ 'Pef' Sol'\ cd\cl 0, (' Cl H-I Q.J& I w ~D to"-i LL n;; 0 --4-e
Q~ Ct f'C'_:::. "'0. ~(1 '(\~+ 4-.ha DQ. '\= ~ \'\ ~G.. nt \ (\ .\-h, ~ C:.U S g ..
-3--
(3)-1~~ roll Cl (\ e_S-\- f ePoct) bDo tl (\~ { e Por·f-, c.tnd t)Of\n\.
_seLf+\ v'\ £b ·
(4) T h Q. t:\ d m of\ 1 ~ h l'Y\01 f -;I u d G e. YY\ P fl + OC'\d c; .czn .\-ex\ c._ II'\(';
S hQ,t:'..-+. Q.oo r+'£:, ~ r d_a\'C1 ~"'~\ ~' r'ld ''(\G, ~ ..
l SJE..l\.l·h re.. 'R 12.?or+ er's Q. e eo r d / cJ e d:_ :Q ~Cbrd .
m
Whe_re 't=Df'P \)(e..YY\\ se_s Q_of'\Std ..e-f'ed, oFFv--nd..or
fQ.-G. OPe.+ -Pu \I Y \:>f'CLV£ ~+ -\.h,~ Uof\0 r~ bl12 eouri- lS ..:_

5 u e. 4--~ .P 'f\ e c__ e_ SS (7A r Y o c d Q r S +o \~v e. 4-h .Q_ 1 e <1< tJ.f' .C:Jed
QPce0M ~ t1>. f\el h P-ur\ f'\G T ('CA-f\ 5 u ,b .Pd eAA~,d 4e Pe. t )+;-
~ f)Q( 'n Q_ G. '('CA (\ t e-c\ 0 Free... ~ PY W I th &LL CD.s t C\<;;6l)-
J

V"Y\ e-d h y 4--.-h .e 6 -\-u.+(2_ ...

(; {' CAv'\-\ StJO----~ v+h P c 0. n d +=t) ~-\- ~e_{' ~ f' L1-P- I= ~J +h ~
~~\'\t">f'rLh( .P QC) ur+ fY\CAY ~ &2.-€-'VJ _1 us+ euA d Pro Poo.

~ee_L A((~ +1on
I w 1LL ARd w E.B ?J FeJ1+1of\ e.f, ?rb 1s e. lo0 (\CK t f\-
i

C.().('Q~Ro.+ecl a+ ~e Polonst.v LJ\'\~-\-, TcX~S O.P'iJG-0\S r13S/

- 5-.·
RELATOR'S EXHIBIT 2
. ·~

To~ \..\D..rn('¥...
· cr~s 'Uo..n'le..\S f

Da\ e.:. 2 / 2 5 i 2..o 1Lt

t: \t2-i.Cls
::,to...\-e_ 0
\) 5\-CA-\-emen\- o~ ·foL-ts. '\1.
1.) Tro..\'\ Sc..~ \'P-\-. \N \ll •

fr-~C-tJ-orb~ (J __C_tf_&c~ _ or t/1~/\lo/- 0-Ct!_r-::Le ~-4£/F ~:~~-t~ ~,:,-;r;i~
__s;:;.ft-~cf O~IJ~F: ~t?!l-----v~, ,_
__________________________ ________p-k,,wt/fk7 &:a~ ~---_________:__ _
 RELATOR'S EXHIBIT 4

(Note: Relator here is unable to provide this
Court with a copy of the "Motion for
Transcripts'' filed with the 179th Judicial
Dist,rict Court on or about the 22nd. day
of April, 2015 and requests that this Court
obtain a copy if necessary from the District
Clerk of said Court nam•:~ly: _Chris Daniel).
 WILLARI:
I·
,,,/ 1/ 111·1 111 1111 1111 1111111 11 1''' 111' 11tll11· 111t/1 1/11

f. ALLRED.--·--
·'·: :.··:· ;j
; . 2101 FM 369 N. . :~·~· ·.

Iowa Park, Tx. 76j67

.f·.

~---------""-~:~=-.......-!.,_

. . ,____-~"'~~=·;. -.:~:. ~---~~~. . --=· ~7,:~~;~----. -.~-~_;~~~
----.

CLER~,

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
of TEXAS, ABEL ACOSTA
P.O. Box 12308, CAPITOL STATIC
AUSTIN, TX. 78711

'\,

·",,.