UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2052
VICTOR B. WHITE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
FNU SMEREKA; FNU TAYLOR; CITY OF CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA;
FNU MACRAE,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
FNU SERGEANT; FNU SMITH; FNU PAULK; FNU CHILDS; FNU TIMMER,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,
District Judge. (3:09-cv-00257-FDW-DCK)
Submitted: January 28, 2011 Decided: February 10, 2011
Before GREGORY and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Victor B. White, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Dennis McDonnell,
Charlotte, North Carolina; David John Adinolfi, II, Special
Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Sean Francis
Perrin, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Charlotte, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Victor B. White appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. White v. Smereka, No. 3:09-cv-00257-FDW-DCK (W.D.N.C.
June 14, 2010 & Aug. 17, 2010). Further, we deny the City of
Charlotte, North Carolina’s motion to dismiss, because we find
that White’s notice of appeal was timely filed. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
White v. FNU Smereka
Combined Opinion