Wolf, Clair A.

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date filed: 2015-02-27
Citations:
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Combined Opinion
                                              NO-       PD-1519-14
                                                                             oir->r2015.
       (B) Appellari'1T""^request                     at        least ninety (90) days extension

             because        Appellant                 has        to attempt to advocate for him-

             -fo "tzhis    Court.

       (C) Appellant             can           only        entertain and research in the unit

             Law     Library              during his off-duty hours which is approx

             imately ten (10)                   hours per week and needs this extension

             to prepare,             research and advocate properly,                               and;

       (D) Appellant             has           never           asked     for        an     extension of time

             in    this    matter.


       The     extension             of        time        is     not        designed,       nor any attempt

to harass,        delay or hinder the Court's calendar with these issues

but    to    assure        that           justice              is served to Appellant.                There are

substantial         intervening                 circumstances that require this Court's

power of supervision,                 they are:

       (1)   The Court of Appeals incorrectly decided that the opinion

             of a lay           witness           which           inferred           that     Appellant      was

             guilty        of        the        offense           charge        is admissable pursuant

             to    Tex.    Rules          of    Evidence,             Rule    701    and    704?


       (2) The       Court        of           Appeals made a ruling that directly con

             flicts        with        a        recent          decision            that    was    handed   down


             by    this most Honorable Court of Appeals in which appeal

             counsel did not cite or argue in the Petition for Discre

             tionary        Review.              Being          such,        this        Court     of Criminal

             Appeals        power          of      Supervision                 should        be     considered


                                                           (     Page-2-        )
                  and    implemented           in   order       to    allow Appellant a fair
                  hearing on his claim.


                                     III.     PRAYER FOR       RELIEF

        Wherefore,            Premises        Considering, Appellant prays that this
most      Honorable           Court grant this Motion for an Extension of Time

to     file       a Motion for Re-hearing pursuant to Tex. R. App. Proc,
Rule     79.1(c)         allowing           Appellant     at     least ninety (90) days to
file     said      motion           because of his specific set of circumstances.
In this Appellant .wMl forever pray.

                                                               Respectfully Submitted,



                                                               Clair A. W o l f 7 •
                                                               Appellant Pro-Se



                                   IV.   CERTIFICATE      OF SERVICE


        I,    Clair          A.     Wolf,     TDCJ-CID# 01859849, Appellant, Pro-Se,

certify       that       a        true and correct copy of Appellant's Motion for

an     Extension        of        Time      to file a Motion for Re-hearing has been

placed       in    the        United        States Mail, postage pre-paid, addressed

State Prosecuting Attorney                                     Abel   Acosta,      Clerk

P.O.   BOX#       12405                                        P.O.   B0X#   12308

Austin,      Texas        78711                                Capitol Station

                                                               Court of Criminal Appeals

                                                               Austin,     Texas      78711



On this the          ^ £2          day of February, 2015

                                                            Respectfully Submitted,



                                                            Clair     A.   Wolf
                                                            Appellant Pro-Se


                                             ( Page-3-)