Upon the rehearing we discover nothing to justify a different conclusion from that heretofore reached.
For the reasons in our former opinion stated and also for the reasons set forth in the opinion in the same case, numbered 206, post, p. 535, the judgment is affirmed.
Buckles, J., and McLaughlin, J., concurred.
Case No. 206, above referred to, immediately follows the decision in this case, and the following is the former opinion heretofore rendered in this case, March 1, 1906: