In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendant Setiri S. Sotiriou appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hentel, J.), dated August 16, 1988, as granted the plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment against him on the issue of liability.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff corpora
The defendant Sotiriou’s claim that the plaintiff’s tax liability was caused by its failure to exhaust its administrative remedies to challenge the tax assessment other than his untimely filing of the bulk sales notice is without merit. The possibility that an administrative appeal would have lessened the tax consequences to the plaintiff is no defense to the plaintiff’s claim that had it been properly advised, the tax assessment would have been obviated entirely (see, Kramer v Belfi, 106 AD2d 615, 616).
We have examined the defendant Sotiriou’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Rubin, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.