Kapl, Inc. v. Meacham

Summarize

Check Treatment

Related Cases

Meacham Corp. v. United States
Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory
Chapman v. Meachum
Clifford B. Meacham, Thedrick L. Eighmie, and Allen G. Sweet, Individually and on Behalf of All Persons Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, James R. Quinn, ph.d., Deborah L. Bush, Raymond E. Adams, Wallace Arnold, William F. Chabot, Allen E. Cromer, Paul M. Gundersen, Clifford J. Levendusky, Bruce E. Palmatier, Neil R. Pareene, William C. Reynheer, John K. Stannard, David W. Townsend, and Carl T. Woodman, Consolidated-Plaintiffs-Appellees, Hildreth E. Simmons, Jr., Henry Bielawski, Ronlad G. Butler, Sr., James S. Chambers, Arthur J. Kaszubski, David J. Kopmeyer, Christine A. Palmer, Frank A. Paxton, Janice M. Polsinelle, Teofils F. Turlais, and Bruce E. Vedder, Consolidated-Plaintiffs-Appellees v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, A/K/A Kapl, Inc., Lockheed Martin Corporation, and John J. Freeh, Both Individually and as an Employee of Kapl and Lockheed Martin, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees
Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory

544 U.S. 957

KAPL, INC., ET AL.
v.
MEACHAM ET AL.

No. 04-955.

Supreme Court of United States.

April 4, 2005.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Smith v. City of Jackson, ante, p. 228. Reported below: 381 F. 3d 56.