PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
__________
No. 08-1872
__________
In re: EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES,
Debtors,
ENERSYS DELAWARE, INC., formerly known as EnerSys Inc.,
Appellant.
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Delaware
(D. C. No. 1-06-cv-00302)
District Judge: Hon. Sue L. Robinson
Argued on May 12, 2009
Before: AMBRO, ROTH and ALARCÓN*, Circuit Judges
Robert Lapowsky, Esquire (Argued)
Neil C. Schur, Esquire
Stevens & Lee, P. C.
1818 Market Street, 29th Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19104
*Honorable Arthur L. Alarcón, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth
Circuit, sitting by designation.
Joseph Grey, Esquire
Stevens & Lee, P. C.
1105 North Market Street, 7th Floor
Wilmington, DE 19801
Counsel for Appellant Enersys Delaware, Inc.
Laura Davis Jones, Esquire
James O’Neill, Esquire
Pachulski, Stang, Ziehl & Jones, LLP
919 North Market Street, 17th Floor
P. O. Box 8705
Wilmington, DE 19899-8705
Matthew N. Kleiman, Esquire (Argued)
Matthew N. Kleiman, P. C.
2506 North Clark Street, Suite 307
Chicago, IL 60614
Roger P. Furey, Esquire
John P. Sieger, Esquire
Andrew L. Wool, Esquire
Katten, Muchin, Rosenman, LLP
2900 K Street NW, Suite 200
Washington, DC 20007-5118
Counsel for Appellee Exide Technologies
ROTH, Circuit Judge:
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
IT IS ORDERED that the published Opinion in the above case, filed on June 1,
2010, be amended as follows:
On page 11, delete the following parenthetical:
“Non-occurrence of a condition is not a breach by a party unless he is under a
2
condition that the condition occur.”
and replace it with:
“Non-occurrence of a condition is not a breach by a party unless he is under a duty
that the condition occur.”
This amendment does not change the date of filing, June 1, 2010.
By the Court,
/s/ Jane R. Roth
Circuit Judge
Dated: June 24, 2010
PDB/cc: All Counsel fo Record
3