Craddock v. Gary J. Rotella & Associates, P.A.

Related Cases

Haefner v. Burkey
Brant v. Hargrove
Westfield Companies v. Rovan, Inc.
Debra Gariety Horst O. Bischoff, as Trustee of Bischoff Family Trust Pamela Hanyzewki John J. Cline Thomas Allen, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Thomas J. Shannon, Jr., as Trustee, Natural Parent and Guardian of Smv Holding Company, Pll Vincent Paul Charles Thornton, Individually and as Trustee, Sep Fred L. Millner Warren H. Hyde Caryl Hyde Teen Response, Incorporated Elizabeth B. Sponseller Michael J. Sponseller Terry Overholser and Lawrence Corman, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, and Crystal N. Shannon City National Bank, a Banking Corporation Coast Partners Financial Corporation, Formerly Known as Coast Partners Securities, Incorporated, a California Corporation, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Intervenor-Plaintiff v. Grant Thornton, Llp, and Herman & Cormany Michael Graham Billy Jean Cherry Terry Lee Church Estate of J. Knox McConnell Philip C. Petty, Administrator Louis J. Pais Michael F. Gibson Andrew L. Rago Julian G. Budnick Gary Ellis J & J Construction Company Hermie Church Diversified Capital Markets Michael Patterson E.E. Powell & Company, Incorporated John Does 1-100 Robert Wagner Quantum Capital Corporation Ferris, Baker, Watts, Incorporated Scott & Stringfellow Nancy Vorono Gunnallen Financial Incorporated Jack Ingold Regis Securities Corporation, A/K/A Quantum Securities Corporation Nancy Vargo Tom Dooley Garvin Tankersley Ellen Turpin Lora McKinney Michael Patterson, Incorporated Kutak Rock Alan D. Strasser, an Individual Michael D. Lambert, an Individual Vida Headrick Evelyn Herron Jeanie Wimmer Virginia Burks Debra Bailey Susan Dalton Robbin White Constance Evans, and Melissa Quizenbeury Hog Pen Enterprises, Incorporated Jlt Enterprises Keystone Hardware C & H Ranch Marbil, Incorporated Hc & Tc Trust Dolores Hughes Bill Pack Wendy Pack Tammy Fisher Larry Fisher Herman Fisher Judy Kahl Andrew T. Rapoff Donna Marie Rapoff Michael A. Rapoff Danny Rapoff Nancy E. Kelanon David Rapoff Andrew J. Rapoff Michael J. Cherry Roslyn A. Cherry Leah M. Cherry Rachel L. Cherry Daniel T. Halsey Sunrise Automotive Group, Incorporated Nancy E. Kelahan Terry L. Rose, Intervenors-Defendants, and H. Lynden Graham, Jr., Trustee v. Advanta Mortgage Corporation USA Celink, Incorporated, Formerly Known as Compulink Service, Incorporated, Third Party and Hargrave Military Academy, a Non-Profit Corporation Waynesburg College, a Non-Profit Corporation Michael Cherry Timmy Cline Vickie Cline the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency First Commerce of America, Parties in Interest. United Bank, Incorporated, Formerly Known as United National Bank Terry Witt Gregory Witt David Witt Scott Witt Gary Witt Dennis Witt, Movants
Rouse v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc.

23 So.3d 865 (2009)

Stephen J. CRADDOCK, Successor Trustee for the Trusts of Brittany Heffermehl and Birger Heffermehl, Minor Grandchildren of Decedent, Nancy H. Grayson, Appellant,
v.
GARY J. ROTELLA & ASSOCIATES, P.A., a Florida Professional Association, Birger W. Heffermehl, Sr., Father and Natural Guardian of Minor Children, Brittany Heffermehl and Birger Heffermehl, Individually and Karl C. Anderson, Esquire, Appellees.

No. 4D09-570.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

December 23, 2009.

Alan M. Burger and Elizabeth Y. Davies of McDonald Hopkins LLC, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Gary J. Rotella of Gary J. Rotella & Associates, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee, Gary J. Rotella & Associates, P.A.

*866 DAMOORGIAN, J.

Stephen J. Craddock appeals the trial court's denial of his Motion to Transfer Venue from Broward County to Palm Beach County. We conclude that venue is legally proper in Broward County and that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion by denying Craddock's motion. See Host Marriott Tollroads, Inc. v. Petrol Enters., Inc., 810 So.2d 1086, 1089-90 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (stating that an order on a motion to transfer venue is reviewed for abuse of discretion unless the order turns on a question of law, in which case the order is reviewed de novo).

Affirmed.

HAZOURI and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.