Fortini v. Murphy

          United States Court of Appeals
                     For the First Circuit


No. 00-2305

                    ROBERT E. FORTINI, III,

                     Petitioner, Appellant,

                               v.

                        PAUL B. MURPHY,

                     Respondent, Appellee.


         APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

               FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

      [Hon. George A. O'Toole, Jr., U.S. District Judge]


                             Before

                      Boudin, Chief Judge,

                Lynch and Lipez, Circuit Judges.


     Robert L. Sheketoff with whom Sheketoff & Homan was on brief
for petitioner.
     Thomas W. Dee, Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Bureau,
with whom Thomas F. Reilly, Attorney General, was on brief for
respondent.




                         July 27, 2001
           BOUDIN, Chief Judge.            This is an appeal by Robert

Fortini from a federal district court order dismissing Fortini's

petition for a writ of habeas corpus.              Fortini is currently

serving a life sentence, having been convicted in state court of

second degree murder.       Fortini's claim depends critically on the

facts of the case which we describe in some detail, identifying

the few significant details that were disputed.

           In 1992, Fortini lived in a second-floor apartment with

his girlfriend, Jacie Hall, and her cousin, Tammy Peckham, in

Plymouth, Massachusetts.       Between 5 p.m. and 9 p.m. on June 22,

Ceasar    Monterio--Fortini's        eventual     victim--came     to   the

apartment on at least three occasions looking for Peckham.                On

one occasion Fortini went downstairs and told Monterio that

Peckham   was   not    at   home.     Shortly    after   Monterio's     last

appearance,     Hall   heard   the    occupants    of    a   car   shouting

profanities as the vehicle drove past the house and she told

Fortini about the incident.

           After spending the evening watching television and

cleaning his shotgun, Fortini went to bed at 11:30 p.m.                   At

11:50 p.m., he was awoken by a car horn and a male voice,

screaming curses and racial epithets towards the house (Fortini

is white; Monterio was black).             Fortini got out of bed, got



                                     -2-
dressed and proceeded down to the his first-floor front porch.1

After sitting on the porch for a period, he returned to his

apartment and, at 12:48 a.m., called the police to report the

earlier disturbance.      The police did not dispatch officers to

the house, but the dispatcher told Fortini that if he got a

license "plate or something . . . [the police could] check them

out."

           Fortini then retrieved his shotgun and ammunition and

returned to his seat on the downstairs porch.              Although the

steps to the second floor were lighted, the porch was not.             At

approximately 1:15 a.m., Monterio and a friend (Dana Lopes)

returned to the house.     According to Fortini, he heard two sets

of footsteps and a whispered conversation.              He then heard a

voice    say,   "watch   this   shit,   we're   going    to   wake   some

motherfuckers up."       Shortly thereafter, he saw someone (who

proved to be Monterio) start up the stairs moving rapidly to the

porch.

           As Monterio reached the porch, Fortini stood up and

took a couple of steps forward towards the porch steps with the



    1There is some uncertainty as to whether Fortini had the
shotgun when he first went down to the porch or took it down
only after he called the police. Compare Commonwealth v.
Fortini, 692 N.E.2d 110, 111 (Mass. App. Ct. 1998), with id. at
112. The trial transcript suggests that he went down with the
shotgun after he called the police.

                                  -3-
shotgun in his hands.       According to Fortini, he then yelled

"hey, get the fuck out of here" to the person on the porch.2             In

response, Fortini said that Monterio stared at Fortini and the

gun, centered his attention on the gun, and then lunged towards

Fortini and the weapon.         Fortini took one step backwards and

fired, striking Monterio in the chest and killing him almost

instantly.

           Fortini   was   charged   with   murder      in   Massachusetts

Superior Court.    In pretrial proceedings, Fortini argued that he

believed Monterio was attempting to take the gun away from him

and that he shot Monterio in self defense.             In support of this

theory, Fortini filed a motion in limine asking to introduce

evidence of Monterio's acts only five to seven minutes before he

stepped onto Fortini's porch and was killed.            The evidence that

Fortini wanted to offer was this:

           According to witnesses, shortly before Monterio arrived

at Fortini's house, Monterio ran onto a basketball court where

four white males were playing night basketball.              Monterio then

struck,   or   attempted   to   strike,   all   four    men.    After   his


    2 Whether Fortini said anything before shooting Monterio is
not certain: Monterio's companion (Lopes) said that Fortini did
not say anything; Fortini's girlfriend (Hall) said that she did
not hear anything before the gunshot, but she also testified
that she was asleep at the time. By contrast, Fortini's next
door neighbor testified that she heard Fortini yelling before
the gunshot.

                                   -4-
companion (Lopes) pulled him away, Monterio yelled, "I'll kill

them all.         Remember my face, I'm Ceasar Monterio.                    I'm the

baddest      motherfucker       in     town."           Immediately       after   the

confrontation,        Monterio       and   Lopes      walked    towards    Fortini's

house.      On the way, a police officer heard Monterio again yell,

"I'm bad.     I'm the baddest motherfucker in the world."                   Monterio

arrived      at     Fortini's        house       a     few     minutes     later.

             In    his   pretrial      motion,        Fortini    argued    that   the

evidence of this episode was admissible because the fight and

the shooting had a "temporal and schematic nexus," and that the

evidence--by showing that Monterio had been violent that night

and   was    acting      in   "hot    blood"--supported          in   various     ways

Fortini's claim of self defense.3                    Rejecting these grounds for

admission, the trial court excluded the evidence in a pretrial

ruling, finding that Fortini was not at the time of the shooting

aware of Monterio's actions on the basketball court (a point

that Fortini did not dispute), see Commonwealth v. Fontes, 488

N.E.2d 760, 762-63 (Mass. 1986), and that Fortini was not the


      3
     The defense argued that Monterio's actions and statements
were relevant in three ways.    First, that they illustrated a
"continuous pattern of illicit activity and aggression" by
Monterio toward Fortini. Second, that Monterio's "present anger
or