Turner & Blanchard, Inc., Libellant v. The S.S. Emilia and A. H. Bull Steamship Co., Lydon Webberet Al., and Maritime Food Corporation

Related Cases

American-Foreign Steamship Corporation, Libelant-Appellant v. United States of America, Stockard Steamship Corporation, Libelant-Appellant v. United States of America, A. H. Bull Steamship Co., Bull-Insular Line, Inc., Baltimore Insular Line, Inc., Libelants-Appellants v. United States of America, New York and Cuba Mail Steamship Company, Libelant-Appellant v. United States of America, Dichmann, Wright & Pugh, Inc., Libelant-Appellant v. United States of America, Polarus Steamship Co., Inc., Libelant-Appellant v. United States of America, A. L. Burbank & Company, Ltd., Libelant-Appellant v. United States of America, T. J. Stevenson & Co., Inc., Libelant-Appellant v. United States of America, North Atlantic and Gulf Steamship Co., Libelant-Appellant v. United States of America, Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc., Libelant-Appellant v. United States of America, Blidberg Rothchild Co., Inc., Libelant-Appellant v. United States of America, Fall River Navigation Co., Libelant-Appellant v. United States
American-Foreign Steamship Corporation, Libelant-Appellant v. United States of America, Stockard Steamship Corporation, Libelant-Appellant v. United States of America, A. H. Bull Steamship Co., Bull-Insular Line, Inc., Baltimore Insular Line, Inc., Libelants-Appellants v. United States of America, New York and Cuba Mail Steamship Company, Libelant-Appellant v. United States of America, Dichmann, Wright & Pugh, Inc., Libelant-Appellant v. United States of America, Polarus Steamship Co., Inc., Libelant-Appellant v. United States of America, A. L. Burbank & Company, Ltd., Libelant-Appellant v. United States of America, T. J. Stevenson & Co., Inc., Libelant-Appellant v. United States of America, North Atlantic and Gulf Steamship Co., Libelant-Appellant v. United States of America, Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc., Libelant-Appellant v. United States of America, Blidberg Rothchild Co., Inc., Libelant-Appellant v. United States of America, Fall River Navigation Co., Libelant-Appellant v. United States
Aloysius Roberts, Libellant-Appellant-Appellee v. S.S. Argentina and Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc., Respondents-Appellees-Appellants
Mamiye Bros., Libellants-Appellants v. Barber Steamship Lines, Inc., and Cross-Appellants v. Atlantic Stevedoring Co. Inc., Impleaded-Respondents — Cross-Appellees. Gelmart Knitting Mills, Inc., Libellants-Appellants v. Barber Steamship Lines, Inc., and Cross-Appellants v. Atlantic Stevedoring Co. Inc., Impleaded-Respondents — Cross-Appellees. Isaac Cohen & Sons Corp., Libellants-Appellants v. Barber Steamship Lines, Inc., and Cross-Appellants v. Atlantic Stevedoring Co., Inc., Impleaded-Respondents — Cross-Appellees
Marshall P. Safir, Arnold Weissberger and Sapphire Steamship Lines, Inc. v. Andrew Gibson, Successor to and Substituted for James W. Gulick, Acting Maritime Administrator, Maritime Administration, United States Department of Commerce, James S. Dawson, Jr., Secretary, Maritime Subsidiary Board, Maritime Administration, United States Department of Commerce, and Maurice Stans, Successor to and Substituted for C. R. Smith, Secretary of Commerce of the United States, American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., Bloomfield Steamship Co., Lykes Bros. Steamship Company, Inc., Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc., United States Lines, Inc., American President Lines, Ltd., Prudential Steamship Co., Inc. And Prudential Grace Lines, Inc., and Farrell Lines, Inc., Intervenors

322 F.2d 249

TURNER & BLANCHARD, INC., Libellant, Appellee,
v.
The S.S. EMILIA and A. H. Bull Steamship Co., et al.,
Respondent, Lydon Webberet al., and Maritime Food
Corporation, Appellants.

No. 411, Docket 28293.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued June 20, 1963.
Decided June 28, 1963.

Before MOORE, HAYS and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Order of May 21, 1963, insofar as appealed, affirmed. 'Service rendered to the ship after arrest, in aid of the discharge of cargo, and afterward pending the sale, necessarily inured to their (lienors) benefit, for it contributed to the creation of the fund now available to them.' The district court had jurisdiction 'to require that expenses which have contributed either to the preservation or creation of the fund in its custody shall be paid before a general distribution among those entitled to receive it.' New York Dock Co. v. The Poznan, 274 U.S. 117, 121, 47 S. Ct. 482, 484, 71 L. Ed. 955 (1927). The district court is requested to proceed with all reasonable and feasible dispatch. Mandate shall issue forthwith.

2

Howard Schulman, New York City (Arthur Abarbanel, New York City, of counsel), for appellants Lydon Webber, et al.

3

David I. Gilchrist, New York City, for appellant Maritime Food Corporation.

4

Foley & Grainger, New York City (Walter A. Darby, Jr., Robert P. Whelan, New York City, of counsel), for appellant Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation.

5

Julius L. Goldstein, New York City, for appellee Turner & Blanchard, Inc.

6

Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, New York City (Clement C. Rinehart, New York City, of counsel), for appellee Caltex (India) Ltd.

7

Dunn & Zuckerman, New York City (James F. Dunn, New York City, of counsel), for appellee Republic of Pakistan.

8

Louis E. Greco, Attorney in Charge, Admiralty and Shipping Section, Department of Justice, New York, N.Y. (Joseph P. Hoey, U.S. Atty. for the Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, N.Y., of counsel), for appellee United States of America.