Maria Teresa Cruz Segui, as Next Friend on Behalf of Digna Luz Ortiz, an Infant, and Hector Luis Ortiz, an Infant v. Ruth Snow Burns O'ROuRke and John P. O'ROuRke

Related Cases

Roque Cruz and Rosaura Cruz, Individually and as Next Friends for Rosibel Cruz, Alvaro Cruz and Perla Evelyn Cruz, Minor Children v. Ben H. Carpenter
Berrios-Berrios v. Thornburg
Marisol A., by Her Next Friend, Reverend Dr. James Alexander Forbes, Jr., Lawrence B., by His Next Friend, Professor Mitchell I. Ginsberg, Thomas C., by His Next Friend, Dr. Margaret T. McHugh Shauna D., by Her Next Friend, Professor Kathryn Conroy, Ozzie E., by His Next Friends, Jill Chaifetz and Kim Hawkins, Darren F. And David F., by Their Next Friends, Juan A. Figueroa, and Reverend Marvin J. Owens, Bill G. And Victoria G., by Their Next Friend, Sister Dolores Gartanutti, Brandon H., by His Next Friend, Thomas J. Moloney, Steven I., by His Next Friend, Kevin Ryan, on Their Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Rudolph W. Giuliani, Mayor of the City of New York, Marva Livingston Hammons, Administrator of the Human Resources Administration and Commissioner of the Department of Social Services of the City of New York, Nicholas Scoppetta, Commissioner of the New York City Administration for Children's Services, George E. Pataki, Governor of the State of New York, Brian Wing, Acting Commissioner of the Department of Social Services of the State of New York
Migdalia Aponte Melendez v. Jaime L. Ortiz Otero
Ortiz Feliciano v. Toledo Davila

328 F.2d 965

Maria Teresa Cruz SEGUI, as next friend on behalf of Digna Luz Ortiz, an infant, and Hector Luis Ortiz, an infant, Appellant,
v.
Ruth Snow Burns O'ROURKE and John P. O'Rourke, Appellees.

No. 18835.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

March 3, 1964.

Fitzsimmons & Petris, Edward R. Fitzsimmons, and Ruth S. Harwitz, Oakland, Cal., for appellants.

Schwab & Kant, and Oliver Schwab, Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellees.

Before BARNES, HAMLEY and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The record discloses no responsive pleading had been filed when this action was dismissed. Rule 15(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is applicable. Cf. Breier v. Northern California Bowling Proprietors Ass'n, 9 Cir. 1963, 316 F.2d 787.

The judgment of dismissal is reversed, and the action remanded with leave to plaintiffs to amend, if they so desire.