Johnson v. State

There are, as we indicated in our original opinion, some other questions — than the one we treated therein — apparent; but, as we also said, they are simple.

We now say that we have examined them again; and it is clear to us that none of them involve a ruling infected with error prejudicial to appellant's rights. Discussion would be profitless.

The judgment must be now affirmed on the authority of the opinion of the majority of the Supreme Court. Code 1923, § 7318.