In concurring in the opinion in this case I deem it proper to add that I do not wish to be understood as holding that either the two sales of the vigintillionth *Page 493 part of the front of the lots in question, or the mortgage thereon referred to in the findings, constitute any defect in the title. The case is substantially the same whether we hold the affirmative or the negative of these questions, and, therefore, I deem it unnecessary to pass upon them.