I am not prepared to say that the defendant was not entitled to move for a new trial.
I am satisfied, however, that it was prejudicial error to admit the testimony concerning the general balance shown by the books of the corporation to be due from the appellant.
On that point, and on all others, save the matter of the right of defendant to move for a new trial, I fully agree with the reasoning and conclusion reached by Justice McFarland and concur in the judgment of reversal.